basilton:

vampishly:

unlubricated-anal-sex:

textbookenigmatic:

spbell:

So for the love of god, shut the fuck up you prude assholes.

TRUTH.

 i’ve reblogged this before but idc

it’s just a boob
it has nutrition for babies

The most bizarre thing after the Janet Jackson “wardrobe malfunction” incident was someone explaining why it was so inappropriate and why such a large fine was warranted.
They said that a woman’s nipples were not appropriate for children.
A woman’s nipples. Not appropriate for children.

So we can sexualize womens’ bodies in media and advertising, especially their breasts, but if a woman tries to use her breast(s) for their original biologically intended purpose, it’s inappropriate? What is wrong with this picture?

basilton:

vampishly:

unlubricated-anal-sex:

textbookenigmatic:

spbell:

So for the love of god, shut the fuck up you prude assholes.

TRUTH.

 i’ve reblogged this before but idc

it’s just a boob

it has nutrition for babies

The most bizarre thing after the Janet Jackson “wardrobe malfunction” incident was someone explaining why it was so inappropriate and why such a large fine was warranted.

They said that a woman’s nipples were not appropriate for children.

A woman’s nipples. Not appropriate for children.

So we can sexualize womens’ bodies in media and advertising, especially their breasts, but if a woman tries to use her breast(s) for their original biologically intended purpose, it’s inappropriate? What is wrong with this picture?

4,189 notes
reblogged from basilton
originally posted by ilovecharts

  1. perdredupoidsfacilement reblogged this from ilovecharts
  2. mamagoosengoslings reblogged this from birthisbeautiful
  3. whitewingedalbatross reblogged this from lipstick-feminists
  4. awwrats reblogged this from lightupyourtorch
  5. nutella-and-nintendo reblogged this from scienceisrad
  6. lightupyourtorch reblogged this from scienceisrad
  7. scienceisrad reblogged this from abovetheice
  8. abovetheice reblogged this from msmediafrenzy
  9. renarde reblogged this from thewherefores
  10. ggaabbii reblogged this from freedomthroughpiracy
  11. freedomthroughpiracy reblogged this from intricateareyou and added:
    That “who” is unnecessary,...the point gets across.
  12. stuckbetweenmytwoselves reblogged this from tethered-to-your-heart
  13. alletsenitsuj reblogged this from my-gay-incest-cat
  14. amandaberger reblogged this from wibbly-w0bbly-timey-wimey
  15. plectrumsandguitars reblogged this from wibbly-w0bbly-timey-wimey
  16. wibbly-w0bbly-timey-wimey reblogged this from paper-criminal
  17. paper-criminal reblogged this from sanityscraps
  18. theburiedgirl- reblogged this from ilovecharts
  19. stopdropandstroll reblogged this from spiderwort-soup
  20. cgarecht reblogged this from the-nip-project
  21. 0pen-cuts reblogged this from breakmyskin
  22. moustaches-and-pistachios reblogged this from penguinsonwheels
  23. youreakidwithabulletsoul reblogged this from notsohappybunny
  24. notsohappybunny reblogged this from veddhartha
  25. idratherbeinsamoa reblogged this from lainexvx
  26. ktfit892 reblogged this from vegfreak
  27. francophonebaker reblogged this from didyoueatallthisacid
  28. zomrabitt reblogged this from regina-cordium
  29. ruthfus reblogged this from peursdesvivants
  30. peursdesvivants reblogged this from holybat
  31. regina-cordium reblogged this from boozledorf